|
Rightmove: Prices
Have Already Fallen 20%
Rightmove says prices have already fallen 20 per cent from their
peak – of which three per cent was from the past four weeks alone.
Evidence suggests that prices will continue to fall sharply. The
average home coming on to the market in England and Wales cost
£222,979 during the four weeks to November 8 – a fall of 7.1 per
cent compared with the same period last year.
Despite the falls, the company warned that new sellers were still
failing to price their properties realistically. “Some sellers could
avoid months of disillusionment and despair if they started
marketing at an asking price a lot closer to where the evidence
indicates they are likely to end up,” said Miles Shipside,
Rightmove's commercial director.
“While average asking prices have fallen by 7.1 per cent over the
past year, in most parts of the country you should look to at least
double that discount to achieve a sale,” he added.
An average of just 20,000 people a week put their property up for
sale during the period, the lowest level recorded by Rightmove since
2002, and well down on the level of around 35,000 a week 12 months
ago.

But Sales Rise as
Prices Come Down
Sales rose slightly in October according to the NAEA. The average
agent sold seven homes during the month compared to just six in
September. “Sellers are beginning to face up to the reality that
their homes are not worth as much as they were 12 months ago,” said
NAEA president, Chris Brown.
This belief seems to be borne out by the property website, Globetrix,
which said almost 6,000 homes on its books had their prices cut by
an average £16,800 last week.
Mortgage Lending Slightly Up
Mortgage lending rose slightly in October, according to the Council
of Mortgage Lenders. Total lending rose to £18.7 billion, seven per
cent up from September. However, last month’s lending was still 44
per cent lower than in October last year.
The CML said lending would remain weak in the next few months,
despite the Bank of England’s cuts in interest rates in October and
November.
“Consumer confidence is now being affected by the worsening economic
outlook,” said the CML’s director general Michael Coogan. “However,
any recovery in lending is also being held back by the continuing
shortage of mortgage funding.”
Up to 40% of Buy-to-Let Borrowers Face Negative Equity…
Up to 40 per cent of buy-to-let borrowers face negative equity says
Standard and Poor’s. Buy-to-let mortgages are already seeing a
proportionally higher level of repossessions than normal
owner-occupier loans and the credit agency is warning that the
market is likely to deteriorate further because it is “more
sensitive” to the difficult credit environment.
Based on an analysis of 200,000 securitised buy-to-let loans – about
20 per cent of the market – S&P said 3.7 per cent were in arrears at
the end of June, compared to 2.9 per cent in a sample of
owner-occupier mortgages.
This led to estimations that 20 to 40 per cent of the market could
fall into negative equity by the middle of next year, significantly
more than the 14 to 20 per cent predicted for the market as a whole.
Kate Livesey, a credit surveillance analyst at S&P, said: “We
believe that the buy-to-let sector could suffer above average loss
severities on repossession cases due to a concentration of certain
property types that are witnessing above average price declines. In
a downturn we believe that the current stock of buy-to-let loans
will carry higher credit risk than the stock of loans to prime
owner-occupiers.”
…And Buy-to-let Rents
are Falling
Buy to let investors are seeing rents fall for the first time in
five years, according to RICs – with the South East suffering most.
In the third quarter of 2008, 56 per cent more chartered surveyors
reported a rise than a fall in new landlord instructions. London and
the Southeast have been hardest hit. The net balance of surveyors
reporting rises or falls in rents for London houses fall from a
stable zero per cent in the second quarter to minus 53 per cent in
the third quarter, while the figure for flats fell from plus five
per cent to minus 33 per cent, the RICS said.
However, the biggest turnaround was in the South East, with the net
balance of surveyors reporting rises or falls in rents for houses
plummeting from plus 53 to minus 33 per cent.
James Scott-Lee of the RICS said: “The lettings sector has witnessed
a boom in 2008 as sales in the housing market continued to slow.
Many have been able to take advantage of rising rents to secure good
returns.
“However, the marketplace has become more and more competitive as
many vendors have been forced to become amateur landlords, creating
an inevitable downward pressure on rents where supply has matched
demand.”
|
|
|

Barratt Warns More Writedowns are Likely
Barratt has warned that more writedowns are likely by the year end.
The company, which has already written down the value of its land by
£208.4 million, said the housing market remained “extremely
challenging” with confidence low, credit limited and prices
continuing to be driven downwards.
It expects the average selling price of its homes to fall 15 to 20
per cent from the peak of the market in July 2007 to the end of this
year.
Mark Clare, chief executive, said: “Conditions in the housing market
are now as tough as anyone can remember with increasing pressure on
prices and margins. Against this backdrop, Barratt’s focused sales
effort has enabled us to deliver robust sales volumes, in line with
management expectations.”
Barratt will review the value of its land before the end of the year
and update the market in February. It is focusing on maximising
sales revenues, reducing costs and generating cash to reduce debt
levels. The company said it continued to operate within committed
facilities and banking covenants.
The company also said it had seen “good” visitor levels, down 5.8
per cent in the period, and sales volumes were in line with
expectations – helped by increasing incentives for potential buyers
and marketing initiatives.
But analysts expressed concern at the Barratt’s update, especially
the predicted fall of average prices of up to 20 per cent.
Imran Akram at Collins Stewart said: “These price declines are
greater than expected. In our view they confirm market rumours that
Barratt has been in the vanguard of cutting prices and chasing
volume, since it was the first housebuilder to renegotiate
covenants. In our view pressure is now growing on the group’s
competitors, who are now also obliged to chase volumes by cutting
prices. This means that Barratt may find it more difficult in future
to maintain volumes.”

HBF Calls for Rise in Homes Fund
The HBF has called for a tenfold increase in the £200 million fund
set up by the government to buy unwanted homes from the private
sector and turn them into social housing.
The fund – announced by Alistair Darling in his spring Budget – must
be expanded to £2 billion in the pre-Budget report to have a
significant impact, according to Stewart Baseley, HBF Executive
Chairman.
The money already allocated for this “clearing house” of homes came
from front-loading the budget of the new Homes and Communities
Agency, which has £8.4 billion to spend over three years.
The HCA is likely in the near future to have huge amounts of unspent
money because a large part of its budget is allocated for housing
projects created through agreements between private developers and
local authorities. With construction grinding to a halt, very few of
these projects are going ahead. This makes it more likely that the
chancellor could increase the size of the HCA’s fund for unwanted
homes, even if it is not to the extent of the £2 billion requested
by the HBF.
But at its current £200 million the impact of the fund appears
likely to be limited. Sarah Teather, Liberal Democrat spokeswoman,
described it as a “pitifully small amount of funding to deal with a
major crisis”.
The clearing house has so far bought 1,531 homes, according to
figures from the DCLG. But 16 of the 20 local authorities with the
longest waiting lists for council housing – including Sheffield,
Brent and Bradford – have not benefited from the fund.
Mr Baseley said that £2 billion could buy most of the approximately
15,000 completed homes languishing on the market.
However, housing associations have warned that many privately built
homes do not meet their strict criteria for space, energy efficiency
or environmental design. As a result, thousands of homes have been
examined and rejected in recent months.
SH Note: Even if some unsold private stock doesn’t meet HA
criteria, surely at the bargain prices they’re offered at, HAs could
buy some and spend a little more if required to bring them up to
their standards. This would benefit both the private and social
housing sectors, especially as the HAs are warning of a
“catastrophe” if social housing supply doesn’t increase rapidly.
|
The What House? Awards 2008
The What House? Awards 2008 are being held at The Grosvenor
House Hotel today, Friday November 21st. If you were unable to
make the event, make sure that you log on to
www.whathouse.co.uk
on Wednesday 26th November for the complete list of this year’s
winners…
|
|
|
|
Government stands by
housing targets
Housing Minister Margaret Beckett says the government will stand by
its housing targets despite the downturn. She said scrapping the
targets would be a cheap and irresponsible move.
With an ageing population and low supply the government’s goals
still essential, Beckett added that she wished to work with the
industry in maintaining capacity so that it could respond when the
market returned. On the issue of zero carbon, she commented that the
question was not whether industry could afford to embrace the
agenda, but whether it could afford not to do so.
But she added that the government must also adjust to changing
circumstances. “It is in both our interests [government and
industry’s] to work towards these objectives, but there is no sense
in being dogmatic about how to get there. We have to be adaptable.
There is something to be said about making a virtue out of
necessity.”
SH Note: With tax revenues collapsing to the point where
public finances were unexpectedly in the red by £1.8 billion last
month, this isn’t going to be an easy target to achieve.

Housing Associations
Warn of Catastrophe
There will be a “catastrophic” collapse in provision of new social
housing at a time of record waiting lists without urgent
intervention by the government, housing associations have warned.
Britain’s 1,900 social landlords, which own half the UK’s stock of
four million council houses, are urging ministers to change the way
they are funded to prevent the supply of new, affordable housing
drying up completely.
The Housing Corporation has begun an urgent review of 258
associations. Of 39 examined so far, four have been given an “amber”
warning, meaning there are serious fears about their future.
Meanwhile, the associations are lobbying the government to relax
limits on how much central funding can be used for development
schemes. At present, the grants from the Housing Corporation can
provide only up to 40 per cent of a scheme’s funding, with the rest
coming from borrowing or sales of private dwellings within the same
projects.
The National Housing Federation is urging ministers to relax this
rule to prevent a “catastrophic” drop in new social housing when
there are a record 1.7 million households – or four million people –
on waiting lists.
Associations have in recent years been encouraged to carry out
development, with the help of bank debt, to subsidise their
activities. Many borrowed heavily at the top of the market to buy
land banks on which they planned to build vast numbers of new homes.
With debt costs rising and finance being withdrawn by banks, some
associations have cut their payrolls, with the largest group, Places
for People, expected to cut 100 staff. A survey by Baker Tilly, the
advisers, shows that 75 per cent of housing association directors
expect to see “significant financial difficulties” in the sector in
the coming year.
|
Join the debate
Is
Margaret Beckett right to stand by the existing housing targets?
Yes
No
If you have any burning issues you
would like us to include in future debates, or you would like to
comment on this or any previous debates, please email us at
debate@showhouse.co.uk |
For more comment and features log on to
www.showhouse.co.uk |
|